Jun 20, 2016
This past Thursday, I was reading the Steve Chapman article in the Chicago Tribune and in the article, he quoted French Sociologist Gustav Le Bon who is best known for his 1895 work The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. While Chapman was trying to explain the Trump phenomenon, I saw an explanation as to why patients with arthritis make decisions as to how to proceed with care. At the recent Orthopedic and Biological Institute meeting in Las Vegas, speaker after speaker including napropaths, chiropractors, and non-board certified physicians presented a show and tell as to how they approach arthritis in this day of expanded access to orthobiologics. The explanations given approached the realm of fantasy; missing from the several day event were science, outcomes and results.
In the past several months, I have watched the entry of large orthopedic companies, with whom I have had a 40-year plus joint reconstruction relationships, into the growing specialty of Orthobiologics. These companies not only bring research support into our specialty of cellular (interventional) orthopedics, they carefully scrutinize those with whom they partner so the net result is evidence based patient care, research and education; not unfounded claims by “Camp Followers”. Witness the ad in a suburban newspaper placed by chiropractors offering stem cell containing amniotic fluid for the treatment of arthritis. I have written about this scientifically unfounded claim in this Blog before and I will emphasize it again, there are no living stem cells in amniotic fluid after processing, irradiating and fast thawing.
Assume if you would that you have an arthritic joint wherein your symptoms and limitations are no longer responsive to cortisone injections, anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, hyaluronic acid injections and the like. Your choices historically have been to either wait until end stage arthritis and then have a joint replacement or have a joint replacement early on and risk the potential adverse life changing consequences versus the potential benefits. Today there is an alternative option that will help postpone a joint replacement or possible help avoid one; it falls within the emerging discipline of Regenerative Medicine. Warning though, don’t be a victim of illusion; seek out a consultation and opinion from a board certified specialist who integrates cellular orthopedic patient care with research and education.
Call (312) 475-1893 to schedule your Orthobiologic consultation.
Tags: arthritis, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Clinical Trial. Mitchell B. Sheinkop, Concentrated Stem Cell Plasma, joint replacement, Knee Pain Relief, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Osteoarthritis, Regenerative, stem cells, technology, treatment
Jun 13, 2016
Just as I hope to improve patient activity with delivery of Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC), Stem Cells and Concentrated Growth Factor for grades 2 and 3 osteoarthritis, might the success of a surgical procedure at the time of the initial trauma be significantly improved by the adjunct of BMC, Stem Cells and GFC thereby heading off a suboptimal response to an initial trauma surgery? Clearly, being driven as medical practice is in the US; that is to assess pain and then determine the anatomical treatments to relieve that pain has to change. It would make more sense for the surgeon to examine the “flaws” in anatomy, and judiciously treat with BMC before the flaw leads to frank pain and other issues. There is a need for the preemptive integration of Cellular Orthopedics in both the early arthritis and traumatic environments.
Bone bruises and bone edema are grossly under treated in the current orthopedic paradigm. If we would offer patients a Bone Marrow Concentrate intervention at the time of injury or in conjunction with surgery, it is possible, actually likely, that progression to higher arthritic scores will be greatly delayed.
To put things in a proper perspective, most patients expect an improvement of physical activity after total knee replacement. In a Feature Article How Much Improvement in Patient Activity Can Be Expected After TKA?, from a major university center in Germany, only 22% of TKR recipients met health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) guidelines and only 31% achieved an active lifestyle. In contrast, our data indicates that greater than 70% of our patients who have undergone a bone marrow concentrate/stem cell intervention for osteoarthritis are active in recreational athletics and fitness pursuits including skiing, cycling, golfing, dancing, hunting, fly fishing, basketball, etc.
You the patient have to determine how to proceed and become an advocate for your own arthritic care be it interventional or preemptive. Clearly, the orthopedic surgical and sports medicine communities are behind in integrating orthobiologics into treatment protocols. To stay ahead and learn more be it arthritis or a recent injury requiring surgical repair, consider a cellular orthopedic consultation 312-475-1893 to schedule an appointment.
Tags: arthritis, athletes, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Concentrated Stem Cell Plasma, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, joint replacement, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, medicine, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Regenerative, Regenexx, Regenexx-SD, stem cells, treatment
Jun 8, 2016
In the late summer of 2015, I was featured on a Fox cable news segment featuring a patient on whom I had performed a Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate –Stem Cell intervention coupled with a subchondroplasty procedure. The patient had experienced a poor result from a right Total Knee Replacement years earlier and was seeking a means of improving function and minimizing her left knee pain resulting from arthritis. Cartilage does not have a nerve supply so scientists and clinicians have long sought a clear understanding of the pain generator in osteoarthritis. While there still is not a clear-cut consensus, many clinicians are looking at the bone marrow lesions seen on an MRI when taken of an arthritic joint as the possible cause of pain associated with arthritis.
In the case of my patient, the combined BMAC-Stem Cell procedure coupled with the subchondroplasty had resulted in a very satisfactory outcome and such maintains at this time to the best of my knowledge. What was unique about my patient was the use of Bone Marrow Concentrate-Stem Cells to serve as the catalyst to effect healing of the bone marrow lesions. Up until that time, surgeons were using a synthetic calcium phosphate material to fill the defects above and below a joint surface with a mandatory three months of protected weight bearing and six months of altered physical activity. The introduction of Bone Marrow Concentrate with Stem cells required 48 hours of crutch support and six weeks of restricted physical activity.
My patient who received media attention served to foster a debate in the medical device industry as to the superior methodology serving as an adjunct to a subchondroplasty. First came the initial trial using a subchondroplasty procedure and synthetic filler with the inherent need for prolonged altered function and assisted ambulation. Now there are several clinical trials in development pertaining to an arthritic joint and the minimally invasive, percutaneous subchondroplasty comparing the synthetic filler to the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate-stem cell adjunct; with the latter used both inside the joint and in the adjacent subchondral bone.
Are your arthritic joint changes affecting both the cartilage and the supporting bone? Is the actual source of your joint pain, the supporting bone or bone marrow lesions adjacent to the hip, knee, ankle or shoulder? It would require a complete examination and review of X-rays and an MRI for me to answer the question and advance the most appropriate therapeutic recommendation. Could it be that the failure of a regenerative intervention wasn’t a failure of the stem cells but rather a failure to address the real pain generator, subchondral bone?
Call for an assessment 312 475 1893 and I will try to answer that question.
Tags: arthritis, athletes, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Clinical Studies, Clinical Trial. Mitchell B. Sheinkop, Hip, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, joint replacement, Knee, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, Microfracture surgery, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Orthopedics, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Pilot Study, Regenerative, Regenexx, Regenexx-SD, stem cells, Subchondroplasty, treatment, Ultrasound Guided Injection
May 12, 2016
You may have seen this subject matter before but research and everyday experience reminds me that one has to hear the informed consent three times for the best retention.
Clinical translation of regenerative medicine technologies requires a source of stem and progenitor cells and growth factors. The most success in Cellular Orthopedics to date has come from Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate wherein concentrations of mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells and soluble growth factors are recovered, concentrated and the joint intervention shortly follows. The procedures we use offer an FDA-compliant means of concentrating autologous stem and progenitor cells, platelets and growth factors to be used in the treatment of osteoarthritis of a joint. In a single event, we may introduce a means of pain relief, increase joint motion, improve activity and quality of life, reverse osteoarthritic changes on a bio-immune basis and possibly affect joint regeneration.
The standard of Regenerative Medicine remains Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate; the most studied approach in clinical practice. I am aware of the option of Fat Graft Harvesting, Micro-fracture of the Fat Graft and injection of the emulsified adipose tissue into a joint; but to the best of my knowledge at this time, the clinical outcomes results are no longer than 90 days, so stay tuned or just keep reading my Blog to update.
Platelet Rich Plasma preparation process certainly has improved over the past several years and now allows for protein and growth factor concentrating but with the notable absence of the Progenitor Cells ( Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, etc.)
Amniotic Fluid Concentrate has recently gained traction in the clinical practice setting as a replacement for Hyaluronic Acid derivatives or synthetic alternatives but the clinical results are only now being studied. I have said it before and I will emphasize, there are no living Stem cells in Amniotic Fluid Concentrate after sterilization and processing. That is not to say, AFC is not a superior option with a longer lasting pain relieving anti-inflammatory benefit to Hyaluronic acid based offerings.
There is no test now that you have studied my Blog but hopefully you are more familiar with Regenerative Therapies. As part of my Clinical Practice, we have developed the Center for Clinical Investigation. To learn what might best suit your needs, call 847 390 7666 and schedule a consultation.
Tags: Amniotic, arthritis, athletes, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Clinical Studies, Concentrated Stem Cell Plasma, FDA, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, joint replacement, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, medicine, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Orthopedics, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Regenerative, Regenexx, stem cells, treatment
Apr 18, 2016
Articulate cartilage has little to no capacity to undergo spontaneous repair because it has no blood supply nor is it able to regenerate across a physical gap. In order to restore cartilage in a skeletally mature patient, there is a need for outside help. In some settings, osteochondral transfer (bone with cartilage) may be harvested from elsewhere in a damaged joint and repositioned or relocated in that joint. In other settings, fresh cadaveric tissue (allograft) may be used. More recently, attempts have been directed at “engineering” cartilage. For engineering to take place, there are three requirements. First must come a matrix scaffold necessary to support tissue formation. Second are cells such as mesenchymal stem cells either from bone marrow or synovial membrane lining the joint. Third comes signaling molecules (cytokines) and growth factors. Platelet Rich Plasma is a source of signaling molecules. While Bone Marrow Concentrate doesn’t meet every need for tissue engineering, to the best of my knowledge at this time, there is nothing superior for a long term successful outcome either as an adjunct to a surgical procedure for a small defect or as a primary intervention for an arthritic joint.
There are several ways to measure success after an attempt at cartilage repair. For a contained or global defect, MRI is the primary outcome measure; whereas for osteoarthritis, the Outcome objective metrics I use have proven statistically significant and reproducible. I write this Blog in between presentations by the faculty at American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery Program: Articular Cartilage Restoration-The Modern Frontier. I came here to learn and learn I did about surgical procedures for contained injury. When it comes to osteoarthritis, I learned little but contributed much. No, I am not being egotistical, I am reporting what transpired at the meeting and what is transpiring in my practice. Of interest is the universal agreement by those treating the global defect with surgery and those of us who treat osteoarthritis with stem cells; including the supporting bone ( bone marrow edema)in the therapeutic algorithm via subchodndroplasty is paramount.
“He, who has data, need not shout”
Tags: Amniotic, arthritis, athletes, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, medicine, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Orthopedics, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Platelet Rich Plasma, Regenerative, Regenexx, stem cells, treatment
Mar 21, 2016
Physicians should be in a constant state of education to keep their skills and knowledge at the forefront so that their patients get the best care possible. At the same time, I personally have devoted over 40 years to integrating patient care with research and education be it directed to joint replacement, and for the past four years, to postponing and at times, avoiding joint replacement. As the vast majority of health professionals, I strive on a daily basis to meet the need of my patients. Each and every patient for whom I provide care is entered into a HIPAA compliant outcomes database. From time to time, results are extracted from that data-base and presented at Cellular Orthopedic meetings. Soon we will be submitting the outcomes of several clinical trials for statistical analysis and publication. Almost every therapeutic intervention I recommend is based on science and statistically significant outcomes; rarely on anecdote.
The emerging field of regenerative medicine aims to deal with arthritis and cartilage injury by providing the required elements (cells, inductive molecules, and local environment) to promote true joint and cartilage regeneration. Cellular Regenerative Medicine is rapidly evolving and changing on an almost weekly basis. This is both good news and bad news as there are those who would try to prosper through marketing rather than science. Witness the invitation I received last week to travel to the Bahamas for stem cell care based on anecdote; or the advertisement for the “opportunity” to attend a weekend course to teach me how to use adipose tissue for every malady in the human body. How is it possible to track outcomes from medical tourism or to teach adipose related cellular orthopedic intervention when the latter is not FDA approved?
To assure you that I remain in the forefront of Cellular Orthopedics, from March 31-April 2, 2016, I will be participating in a Continuing Educational course, Articular Cartilage Restoration: The Modern Frontier, sponsored by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. This is a premier skills course that provides hands-on exposure and practice for the most updated techniques in cartilage restoration while allowing for a contemporary overview of established and new procedures to treat the entire knee joint for cartilage damage ranging from focal defects to arthritis.
Although I no longer am involved with orthopedic resident education, as Professor Emeritus at Rush, I have taken the Interventional Orthopedics Foundation pledge to continue to integrate my clinical interventions with outcomes surveillance. Several scientific presentations at the early March meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons resulted because of my ongoing initiatives. I am the orthopedic surgeon who four years ago, exchanged a scalpel for a stem cell.
Tags: arthritis, athletes, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Clinical Studies, FDA, Hip, Interventional Orthopedics, joint replacement, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, medicine, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Pilot Study, Regenerative, Regenexx, Regenexx-SD, stem cells, treatment
